You are browsing a read-only backup copy of Wikitech. The live site can be found at wikitech.wikimedia.org
The schedule says things like "phase 1, phase 2, phase 3" and this page says "group0, group1, group2". Further, I don't think loginwiki is phase 1 or group0 anymore. --marktraceur (talk) 20:31, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah...... so, I think I'mma gonna kill mw:Roadmap#Schedule_for_the_deployments (just that section, leave the rest) and replace it with a description of our WMF-specific release cycle (where when, generaly) and point to Deployments for the canonical list of what's coming when for specific wmfXXs. Greg Grossmeier (talk) 17:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
I've noticed that most patch authors with deployment privileges prefer to scap their own changes. However, it's not clear who plans to do this unless the reader has memorized the list of deployer names. When all patches will be self-deployed, there's no need to have any single person managing the SWAT process (AIUI) so tagging oneself might be useful? For discussion...
This would be possible to automate if Template:ircnick included some code to check against the list of deployers, and perhaps add a colored dot or icon next to the name if the author has permissions to scap. Awight (talk) 08:40, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- Personally, when I'm intending to deploy something myself I don't put it in the SWAT window so as to leave more spaces for people without deployment rights. There's usually good times still open on the calendar outside of the windows. Anomie (talk) 14:04, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
The notes in the infobox currently put the first SWAT of the day at 6:00 Pacific, but the current calendar entries start at 4:00 PDT (which I assume is the same as Pacific). The infobox also claims that on Wednesday, the second SWAT of the day is at 10:00 Pacific, but in the current calendar it’s at 11:00 PDT just like on Monday and Thursday. Is the infobox wrong/outdated, or is the calendar being created incorrectly? --Lucas Werkmeister (WMDE) (talk) 11:17, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
No deployments next week?
@Greg Grossmeier: We see on Deployments/Yearly calendar that there will be no deployments or backports next week, but the detailed Deployments calendar still includes regular backport windows. Please advise! —Awight (talk) 07:43, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry about that, calendarbot saw there was not train and posted the new schedule. The yearly calendar is correct: no deploys except emergencies next week Thcipriani (talk) 22:44, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Deployment schedule for weeks of August 30 weeks is missing!
- They were fixed by @Thcipriani in this edit, thanks for spotting! Jforrester (talk) 15:28, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Please consider fixing Thurdsay's schedule: https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Deployments&oldid=1949425
- UTC evening backport and config training: 21:00–22:00 UTC: Deployer Brennen (brennen)
- UTC late backport window: 21:00–22:00 UTC: Deployer Roan (RoanKattouw), Lucas (Lucas_WMDE), Martin (Urbanecm)
- @4nn1l2 I’ve moved the training window to the usual “afternoon backports” time, assuming that this is correct (pending review in ). Feel free to add your config change there. Lucas Werkmeister (WMDE) (talk) 16:34, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Wikimedia blog announcements still relevant?
@thcipriani: Page says "Deployments of new or major features should be announced on the Wikimedia blog". Not sure which blog that is about nowadays (as it lacks a link). I assume it's not anymore official https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/ / meta:Wikimedia Blog, and https://techblog.wikimedia.org/ is also more for dedicated stories than announcements, and https://diff.wikimedia.org/ is more a community catch-all. Should the blog item be removed? --aklapper (talk) 08:09, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- I honestly don't know what blog that referred to; it's definitely ambiguous now. I changed that bullet point to be two separate bullet points—one for notifying community, one for notifying engineers. There are links in the new text to a couple of "blog" disambiguation pages now. Does that look better to you? –Thcipriani (talk) 21:00, 23 May 2022 (UTC)